Note: The below information is deprecated as HAProxy Enterprise now offers a fully functional native WAF module which supports whitelist-based rulesets, blacklist-based rulesets, and support for ModSecurity rulesets!

Synopsis

I’ve already described WAF in a previous article, where I spoke about WAF scalability with apache and modsecurity.
One of the main issue with Apache and modsecurity is the performance. To address this issue, an alternative exists: naxsi, a Web Application Firewall module for nginx.

So using Naxsi and HAProxy as a load-balancer, we’re able to build a platform which meets the following requirements:

• Web Application Firewall: achieved by Apache and modsecurity
• High-availability: application server and WAF monitoring, achieved by HAProxy
• Scalability: ability to adapt capacity to the upcoming volume of traffic, achieved by HAProxy
• DDOS protection: blind and brutal attacks protection, slowloris protection, achieved by HAProxy
• Content-Switching: ability to route only dynamic requests to the WAF, achieved by HAProxy
• Reliability: ability to detect capacity overusage, this is achieved by HAProxy
• Performance: deliver response as fast as possible, achieved by the whole platform

The picture below provides a better overview:

The LAB platform is composed by 6 boxes:

• 2 ALOHA Load-Balancers (could be replaced by HAProxy 1.5-dev)
• 2 WAF servers: CentOS 6.0, nginx and Naxsi
• 2 Web servers: Debian + apache + PHP + dokuwiki

Nginx and Naxsi installation on CentOS 6

Purpose of this article is not to provide such procedue. So please read this wiki article which summarizes how to install nginx and naxsi on CentOS 6.0.

Diagram

The diagram below shows the platform with HAProxy frontends (prefixed by ft_) and backends (prefixed by bk_). Each farm is composed by 2 servers.

Configuration

Nginx and Naxsi

Configure nginx as a reverse-proxy which listen in bk_waf and forward traffic to ft_web. In the mean time, naxsi is there to analyze the requests.

server {
 proxy_set_header Proxy-Connection "";
 listen       192.168.10.15:81;
 access_log  /var/log/nginx/naxsi_access.log;
 error_log  /var/log/nginx/naxsi_error.log debug;

 location / {
  include    /etc/nginx/test.rules;
  proxy_pass http://192.168.10.2:81/;
 }

 error_page 403 /403.html;
 location = /403.html {
  root /opt/nginx/html;
  internal;
 }

 location /RequestDenied {
  return 403;
 }
}

HAProxy Load-Balancer configuration

The configuration below allows the following advanced features:

• DDOS protection on the frontend
• abuser or attacker detection in bk_waf and blocking on the public interface (ft_waf)
• Bypassing WAF when overusage or unavailable

######## Default values for all entries till next defaults section
defaults
  option  http-server-close
  option  dontlognull
  option  redispatch
  option  contstats
  retries 3
  timeout connect 5s
  timeout http-keep-alive 1s
  # Slowloris protection
  timeout http-request 15s
  timeout queue 30s
  timeout tarpit 1m          # tarpit hold tim
  backlog 10000

# public frontend where users get connected to
frontend ft_waf
  bind 192.168.10.2:80 name http
  mode http
  log global
  option httplog
  timeout client 25s
  maxconn 10000

  # DDOS protection
  # Use General Purpose Couter (gpc) 0 in SC1 as a global abuse counter
  # Monitors the number of request sent by an IP over a period of 10 seconds
  stick-table type ip size 1m expire 1m store gpc0,http_req_rate(10s),http_err_rate(10s)
  tcp-request connection track-sc1 src
  tcp-request connection reject if { sc1_get_gpc0 gt 0 }
  # Abuser means more than 100reqs/10s
  acl abuse sc1_http_req_rate(ft_web) ge 100
  acl flag_abuser sc1_inc_gpc0(ft_web)
  tcp-request content reject if abuse flag_abuser

  acl static path_beg /static/ /dokuwiki/images/
  acl no_waf nbsrv(bk_waf) eq 0
  acl waf_max_capacity queue(bk_waf) ge 1
  # bypass WAF farm if no WAF available
  use_backend bk_web if no_waf
  # bypass WAF farm if it reaches its capacity
  use_backend bk_web if static waf_max_capacity
  default_backend bk_waf

# WAF farm where users' traffic is routed first
backend bk_waf
  balance roundrobin
  mode http
  log global
  option httplog
  option forwardfor header X-Client-IP
  option httpchk HEAD /waf_health_check HTTP/1.0

  # If the source IP generated 10 or more http request over the defined period,
  # flag the IP as abuser on the frontend
  acl abuse sc1_http_err_rate(ft_waf) ge 10
  acl flag_abuser sc1_inc_gpc0(ft_waf)
  tcp-request content reject if abuse flag_abuser

  # Specific WAF checking: a DENY means everything is OK
  http-check expect status 403
  timeout server 25s
  default-server inter 3s rise 2 fall 3
  server waf1 192.168.10.15:81 maxconn 100 weight 10 check
  server waf2 192.168.10.16:81 maxconn 100 weight 10 check

# Traffic secured by the WAF arrives here
frontend ft_web
  bind 192.168.10.2:81 name http
  mode http
  log global
  option httplog
  timeout client 25s
  maxconn 1000
  # route health check requests to a specific backend to avoid graph pollution in ALOHA GUI
  use_backend bk_waf_health_check if { path /waf_health_check }
  default_backend bk_web

# application server farm
backend bk_web
  balance roundrobin
  mode http
  log global
  option httplog
  option forwardfor
  cookie SERVERID insert indirect nocache
  default-server inter 3s rise 2 fall 3
  option httpchk HEAD /
  # get connected on the application server using the user ip
  # provided in the X-Client-IP header setup by ft_waf frontend
  source 0.0.0.0 usesrc hdr_ip(X-Client-IP)
  timeout server 25s
  server server1 192.168.10.11:80 maxconn 100 weight 10 cookie server1 check
  server server2 192.168.10.12:80 maxconn 100 weight 10 cookie server2 check

# backend dedicated to WAF checking (to avoid graph pollution)
backend bk_waf_health_check
  balance roundrobin
  mode http
  log global
  option httplog
  option forwardfor
  default-server inter 3s rise 2 fall 3
  timeout server 25s
  server server1 192.168.10.11:80 maxconn 100 weight 10 check
  server server2 192.168.10.12:80 maxconn 100 weight 10 check

Detecting attacks

On the load-balancer

The ft_waf frontend stick table tracks two information: http_req_rate and http_err_rate which are respectively the http request rate and the http error rate generated by a single IP address.
HAProxy would automatically block an IP which has generated more than 100 requests over a period of 10s or 10 errors (WAF detection 403 responses included) in 10s. The user is blocked for 1 minute as long as he keeps on abusing.
Of course, you can setup above values to whatever you need: it is fully flexible.

To know the status of IPs in your load-balancer, just run the command below:

echo show table ft_waf | socat /var/run/haproxy.stat - 
# table: ft_waf, type: ip, size:1048576, used:1
0xc33304: key=192.168.10.254 use=0 exp=4555 gpc0=0 http_req_rate(10000)=1 http_err_rate(10000)=1

Note: The ALOHA Load-balancer does not provide watch tool, but you can monitor the content of the table in live with the command below:

while true ; do echo show table ft_waf | socat /var/run/haproxy.stat - ; sleep 2 ; clear ; done

On the Waf

Every Naxsi error log appears in /var/log/nginx/naxsi_error.log. IE:

2012/10/16 13:40:13 [error] 10556#0: *10293 NAXSI_FMT: ip=192.168.10.254&server=192.168.10.15&uri=/testphp.vulnweb.com/artists.php&total_processed=3195&total_blocked=2&zone0=ARGS&id0=1000&var_name0=artist, client: 192.168.10.254, server: , request: "GET /testphp.vulnweb.com/artists.php?artist=0+div+1+union%23foo*%2F*bar%0D%0Aselect%23foo%0D%0A1%2C2%2Ccurrent_user HTTP/1.1", host: "192.168.10.15:81"

Naxsi log line is less obvious than modsecurity one. The rule which matched os provided by the argument idX=abcde.
No false positive during the test, I had to build a request to make Naxsi match it 🙂 .

conclusion

Today, we saw it’s easy to build a scalable and performing WAF platform in front of any web application.
The WAF is able to communicate to HAProxy which IPs to automatically blacklist (throuth error rate monitoring), which is convenient since the attacker won’t bother the WAF for a certain amount of time 😉
The platform allows to detect WAF farm availability and to bypass it in case of total failure, we even saw it is possible to bypass the WAF for static content if the farm is running out of capacity. Purpose is to deliver a good end-user experience without dropping too much the security.
Note that it is possible to route all the static content to the web servers (or a static farm) directly, whatever the status of the WAF farm.
This make me say that the platform is fully scallable and flexible.
Thanks to HAProxy, the architecture is very flexible: I could switch my apache + modexurity to nginx + naxsi with no issues at all 🙂 This could be done as well for any third party waf appliances.
Note that I did not try any naxsi advanced features like learning mode and the UI as well.

Related links

• naxsi
• HTTP request flood mitigation
• Use a load-balancer as a first row of defense against DDOS
• On-Demand Webinar: DDoS Attack and Bot Protection with HAProxy Enterprise

Links

• HAProxy Enterprise
• HAPRoxy Enterprise Web Application Firewall
• High Performance Security
• HAProxy ALOHA Load Balancer